Home > Blog > Archive

Posts Tagged ‘Obama’

President Obama Announces $1 Billion Fund to Promote Energy Efficient Vehicles

Thursday, March 8th, 2012
President Barack Obama tours a Daimler Trucks North America plant (March 7, 2012)

President Barack Obama excursions Daimler Trucks North The usa Mt. Holly Truck Producing Plant in Mount Holly, North Carolina, March 7, 2012. On this element of the tour the President noticed the Chassis Airing Station the place multi-coloured nylon air lines are set up for the brake system. (Official White Residence Image by Pete Souza)

Nowadays, President Obama made a vacation to a developing plant for Daimler Vans North America in Mount Holly, North Carolina. He was in the Tar Heel state to&nbspdiscuss more methods his administration is getting an all-of-the-over strategy to American power.&nbsp

He talked about how his administration is pursuing new domestic vitality resources, increasing oil and fuel production, and reducing our overall reliance on oil by way of advancement of renewable electricity.&nbsp

But at a put exactly where workers are occupied assembling vans that operate on all-natural fuel, the President also declared a new $ one billion Nationwide Local community Deployment Problem to aid enhance the deployment of clean, innovative vehicles all over America:

To cities and towns all throughout the region, what we&rsquore heading to say is, if you make a dedication to get far more advanced autos for your community — no matter whether they operate on electricity or biofuels or organic fuel — we&rsquoll aid you minimize by means of the red tape and construct fueling stations close by. And we&rsquoll offer you tax breaks to family members that get these automobiles, businesses that buy different gasoline vans like the ones that are produced appropriate here at Mount Holly. So we&rsquore heading to give communities across the nation a lot more of an incentive to make the shift to a lot more energy-successful automobiles.

Have queries about President Obama's Blueprint for American-Made Power? Find out far more below.


&nbsp

White Home.gov Blog Feed

BREAKING: Mitt Romney Urged Obama to Embrace the Individual Mandate

Saturday, March 3rd, 2012

image

Had Michigan not been as near, the Democrats would have waited to spring this on us in the basic election. Thankfully we have it now and I hope Ohio voters are paying out attention.

In July 2009, Mitt Romney wrote an op-ed in USA Today urging Barack Obama to usean individual mandate at the countrywide stage to control healthcare fees.

On the campaign path now, Mitt Romney says the person mandate is appropriate for Massachusetts, but not the nation. Repeatedly in debates, Romney has explained he opposes a nationwide personal mandate.

But back in 2009, as Barack Obama was formulating his health care vision for the region, Mitt Romney encouraged him publicly to use an specific mandate. In his op-ed, Governor Romney recommended that the federal federal government learn from Massachusetts how to make health care available for all. One particular of those items was “Using tax penalties, as we did, or tax credits, as other people have proposed, encourages “free riders” to take duty for on their own relatively than pass their health-related charges on to other individuals.”

Close friends, if Mitt Romney is the nominee, we will be unable to fight Obama on an issue that sixty% of People in america consent with us on.

RedState

Mitt Romney urged President Obama to propose individual mandate

Saturday, March 3rd, 2012
Mitt Romney had formerly endorsed taking Romneycare’s mandate to federal level in 2007
&nbsp

Andrew Kaczynski digs up a impressive July 2009 op-ed from Mitt Romney in which Romney not only brags about the success of the personal mandate in Massachusetts, but urges President Obama to assist it at the federal level:

Because of President Obama’s frantic technique, wellness treatment has run off the rails. For the sake of forty seven million uninsured Americans, we need to get it again on monitor.

Wellbeing care can’t be handled the very same way as the stimulus and cap-and-trade expenses. With those, the president caught to the aged design of lawmaking: He threw in each unique favor conceivable, floor it up and crammed it through a partisan Democratic Congress. Wellbeing treatment is simply as well important to the financial system, to employment and to America’s families to be larded up and rushed via on an artificial deadline. There’s a far better way. And the classes we learned in Massachusetts could aid Washington discover it.

And what had been those lessons?

First, we set up incentives for people who had been uninsured to buy insurance policy. Utilizing tax penalties, as we did, or tax credits, as other people have proposed, encourages “free of charge riders” to take obligation for themselves instead than move their health-related costs on to others.

That, my close friends, is the personal mandate. And Mitt was happy of it:

The Massachusetts reform aimed at finding practically all our citizens insured. In that, it labored: 98% of our citizens are insured, 440,000 previously uninsured are coated and almost fifty percent of people acquired insurance on their personal, with no subsidy.

And if President Obama had been prepared to shift ahead without the public option (which he was), then Mitt Romney explained he was all set to shift forward with a national plan:

Republicans will join with the Democrats if the president abandons his authorities insurance plan, if he endeavors to craft a plan that does not burden the nation with higher financial debt, if he broadens his scope to decrease wellness costs for all People in america, and if he is willing to commit the demanding effort, requisite time and bipartisan approach that wellbeing care reform deserves.

And, as Mitt Romney manufactured distinct at the leading of his op-ed, the program he supported was a single constructed about what he mentioned worked in Massachusetts—including the individual mandate.

Nevertheless even with his crystal clear embrace of the personal mandate as component of federal wellbeing care reform, Mitt Romney has confronted such a weak set of rival candidates that not a single one of them has brought this up in the 20 Republican debates.

But as lucky as Mitt Romney has been to confront this sort of a staggeringly incompetent Republican subject, he won’t be so blessed next fall. And you can wager your bottom greenback that the really first time he tries to strike President Obama about health care reform in the debates, he is going to get this thrown proper back in his encounter. And he’ s not heading to like how it turns out.




Everyday Kos

Solange Uwimana: Facts Puncture The Myth That Obama “Apologies” Have Ruined U.S. Standing

Wednesday, February 29th, 2012

Correct-wing
media are attempting to breathe new existence into the never-dormant
correct-wing mantra that
President Obama is the “apologist in chief” in order to argue that Obama has “diminished” America’s
standing in the world — an argument that is contradicted by America’s real
standing in the globe.

Right after
Obama apologized to Afghanistan for the actions
of U.S. army personnel posted there, conservative media figures&nbsplambasted him for “consistently
bending about backwards” and “exhibiting weak point … in Afghanistan and
somewhere else all around the world.” Fox News’ Sean Hannity, one of the greatest
purveyors of the “apology tour” myth, has even claimed that this is proof of
just how a lot Obama has damaged America’s standing in the entire world.

But
all of this — from Obama “constantly” apologizing for The usa to his hurting U.S. picture
overseas — is a good deal of nonsense.

1st,
let’s cue Hannity, who devoted two individual segments on his two various
platforms to pushing this meme:&nbsp


Media Issues for America – County Reasonable

10 Ways Obama Could Reduce Gasoline Prices Now

Saturday, February 25th, 2012

Tulsa World headline:

Obama: No magic bullet to decrease gasoline costs

WASHINGTON — President Barack Obama claims there is no effortless answer to the dilemma of climbing vitality rates, dismissing Republican programs to address the difficulty as tiny more than gimmicks.

“We know there’s no silver bullet that will deliver down gas charges or lessen our dependence on foreign oil overnight,” Obama stated Saturday in his weekly radio and Net deal with.  …

Obama stated Republicans have a single answer to the oil pinch: Drill.

“You know that’s not a plan, particularly because we’re currently drilling,” Obama mentioned, echoing his remarks before in the week. “It’s a bumper sticker.”

Talking of bumper stickers, bear in mind “Yes We Can”, Mr. President? No a single understands the idea far better than the oil and gas business. The primary point keeping domestic energy companies again from generating a much better commitment to future domestic materials is uncertainty. Money hates uncertainty, avoids it like the plague. Your rhetoric may possibly appease your doctrinaire base, but it helps make domestic vitality producers hold again, fearful that you will punish their good results, or that you will adjust the guidelines on them in the center of the match.

Erasing uncertainty is the #one thing you can do as a nationwide leader if you definitely desire to lower gas rates. Not only could it modify the psychology of vitality investing, there is nevertheless time for companies to alter their 2012 investment programs.

Underneath the fold is my humble ten-point program: Factors President Obama could (but won’t) do to minimize domestic gasoline costs by November 2012.

1.  Commit to a strategic objective of North American vitality safety. That consists of affordable and liable domestic drilling. That contains using the direct on the Keystone XL Pipeline we could find a way to make it come about while addressing the legitimate environmental worries of Nebraskans. It contains a commitment to preserving the Trans-Alaska Pipeline Program and opening ANWR.
two.  Ditch the anti-industry, anti-capitalist rhetoric. It is not the President’s or the federal government’s area to choose when an industry’s profitability is “high ample”. Substantial oil firm earnings fund much more drilling much more drilling signifies more foreseeable future supply and decrease rates. Besides, American oil companies are not owned by a cabal of rich executives, but by America’s pension funds, mutual cash and personal investment accounts. “They” are “us”.
three.  Stop concentrating on the oil sector for punitive tax therapy. States this kind of as Texas and Louisiana have production tax abatement applications that have effectively encouraged new drilling. If you don’t feel that the risk of elevated taxes discourages drilling, just consult Governor Perry or Governor Jindal.
four.  Realize that Uncle Sam is in the vitality business and is a associate in industry’s success. Oil and fuel royalties are the federal govt’s #two supply of income, immediately after the earnings tax. Offshore slowdowns harm not only sector and work, but authorities earnings.
five.  Recognize that business does not need to have to be led by federal government market demands to be unleashed and encouraged to innovate. The resurgence of the domestic energy sector was rooted in the non-public sector, not issue how much President Obama and Dr. Chu would like to take credit rating for it. The development in North Dakota, Pennsylvania and Texas transpired in spite of the federal authorities, not because of it.
6.  Trust that no oil operator wishes to be the “next BP”. The BP spill cost that firm a thing on the purchase of $ forty billion. Business basic safety and environmental motivation is determined a lot more out of self-curiosity and a lot less out of fear of the govt. When it comes to federal regulation, the nation would be better served by Sheriff Taylor, not Barney Fife.
seven.  Return offshore permitting to the pre-Macondo tempo.  Your overreaction to the BP Spill has value on the purchase of 500,000 barrels per day of domestic oil creation from the Gulf of Mexico. The ridiculous “Worst Situation Discharge” calculation as a schedule portion of offshore permitting is engineering malpractice, in my humble view. The professional workers of the Bureau of Security and Environmental Enforcement is able of reasoned regulation, but they at the moment operate in fear of their political masters.
8.  Declare hydraulic fracturing & nicely design to be the regulatory domain of the states, not the EPA. Geology and surroundings fluctuate broadly Pennsylvania is not Louisiana is not North Dakota is not California. It is insanity to feel that 1 broadly-applied set of policies can be utilized to regulate sector without having suffocating improvement.
9.  Rescind the not too long ago-enacted royalty charge improve for new onshore Federal oil and gasoline leases. Secretary Salazar’s said rationale for escalating the government’s just take by a whopping fifty% – from twelve.five% to 18.75% of gross production – was to equate onshore royalties with the offshore royalty charge. That tends to make no sensation. Increased royalties mean significantly less drilling, poorer economics of production and premature abandonment of wells. Apart from, an IHS-CERA Study not too long ago showed that the federal government’s total just take of offshore cash flows helps make the Gulf of Mexico the second-most punitive fiscal regime in the globe, after Hugo Chavez’s Venezuela. [Update: In trying to keep with the Very first Rule of Holes, rolling back the royalty fee increase may possibly be the 1st point the government really should do if it is serious about decreasing power rates. - Ed.]
ten. Encourage advancement of a nationwide distribution system of normal gasoline as a transportation gas. Natural gasoline is clean, ample and almost a hundred% domestic. Its prospective as a transportation gas has scarcely been tapped.

Bonus #eleven: Get real about the guarantee of option fuels. Not too long ago you stated: “You’ve received a bunch of algae out there If we can figure out how to make power out of that, we’ll be undertaking alright.” Maybe so, but I will adhere my neck out and say it ain’t gonna take place, at the very least not in my lifetime, not on a scale that will impact pump rates.

Electricity policy will be a President Obama’s crucial vulnerability in November. His objective has usually been to encourage substitute fuels by raising traditional power prices. Alternative energy might poll well, but the average voter who fills his tank with $ 4+ gasoline on the way to the ballot box will absolutely “Hope for Change”.

Cross-posted at stevemaley.com.

Follow @VladimirRS
!purpose(d,s,id)var js,fjs=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[]if(!d.getElementById(id))js=d.createElement(s)js.id=idjs.src=”//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js”fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js,fjs)(document,”script”,”twitter-wjs”)

RedState

Tech at Night: Cybersecurity battle sends McCain to find Republican help, LightSquared fights, Obama regulators are dangerous!

Saturday, February 18th, 2012

Tech at Night

The big stories this week keep on to be LightSquared and cybersecurity. Even as Property Democrats complain about federal government performing as well much, extremely, we see that Senate Democrats are so inflexible that John McCain is in a gang of Republicans to combat the Democrats on the cybersecurity expenses. Take into account that. That’s how severe Harry Reid, Joe Lieberman, Jay Rockefeller, and Susan Collins are on this. John McCain is putting with each other a staff to make a Republican monthly bill with Kay Bailey Hutchison and others, alternatively than signal on with a Democrat on a monthly bill. Danger, Will Robinson! Harry Reid is that significantly of an extremist!

Reid is rushing to pass it, but particulars arrive out anyways, this kind of as an strike on FOIA. Transparency! Not.

Talking of transparency, the firm that the Barack Obama FCC has remained oddly silent on, and that insists the FCC must continue to be silent on, is available to go on the offensive. It nearly seems like LightSquared bet the business on this, and will go down swinging. They could stop up making a spectrum trade even though, which if workable would be intriguing.

There is good news, although. The tax deal has in essence pressured the President to go along with some FCC spectrum reform. With latest engineering, spectrum is a finite resource that we should deal with for the higher good. That indicates obtaining into the fingers of the individuals who can use it the best, and we can make a decision that with marketplace forces. Spectrum auctions produce work opportunities though, as we’ve observed with LightSquared, Some spectrum needs to be held aside for country wide protection, civil defense, and 1st responders.

PATENT WARS. Properly, Patent and Trademark wars. China steals iPads in its fascist bias versus the foreign Apple claim. Turns out even though that Amazon’s current steps in China have been not anti-Apple and had been unrelated to the trademark battle.

Apple is on the successful side in another nation, however. Apple is winning more than Motorola Mobility (the organization getting acquired by Google, so shortly this will be a direct Apple-Google war) over Motorola’s clear infringement of a slide-to-unlock patent. I feel Google will resolve this by making use of an additional gesture for unlocking a cellphone.

Oh sure, and another Google/Apple issue to pas the popcorn on: Google tries to monitor you even when your iPhone tries to quit it. Google is virtually definitely lying by way of its teeth when it statements that it’s not monitoring anything at all at all. That’s what Google does, it’s their core merchandise: the synthesis of data to offer targeted advertising and marketing. That’s why they produced the large stink about unifying your accounts throughout internet sites and unifying the privacy guidelines for them.

But this an market make any difference. The inflated moi on Capitol Hill need to have to just take Will Riker’s suggestions to the fake Jean-Luc Picard: “Shut up. Close your mouth and quit conversing.” No person desires to hear them chatting to listen to themselves discuss, and nobody wants any legislation.

Mary Bono Mack: You’re nevertheless my representative. I so badly desire you’d discover some thing effective to do. We don’t want a privacy nanny. We genuinely don’t. Government regulation is more difficult to stay away from and much more harmful than anything Google is performing. Google is optional. You people aren’t.

The truth is men and women want to market their privacy. It’s just not that valuable to them. Firms off the Net have worked that angle for many years. And guess what? When folks can get a small of your privacy, they can offer you stuff low cost, or even free of charge. You have a selection. Use it, or not. Depart govt out of it.

The Anontards retain hitting webpages. Anonymous is even a failure at daily life than the Occupations. These social outcasts, jerks and losers who tell by themselves they have Asperger’s Syndrome so that they don’t chance killing their selves for being just full wastes of human flesh, they are unbathed, semi-literate, lazy fools who can’t have a conversation and hardly even attempt. And they deface webpages! Inconveniencing innocent 3rd events, costing the taxpayers (which includes their moms and dads, I’m confident) without having in fact accomplishing anything at all. Enjoyment!

Again, Include the SEC to the checklist of runaway regulators staying cheered by George Soros-funded front groups like Free of charge Press. We have to conquer Obama. I’m sorry, but you’re blind if you can’t see that there’s a striking, enormous, wide gap amongst this radical socialist and any Republican. That’s correct. Any Republican. Indeed, including the one particular you don’t like. I don’t treatment. Read, examine, and look at this. The EPA, the FCC, the FTC, the SEC, they’re all packed with radicals who think by themselves earlier mentioned the law. Following they’re coming after university lunches. Just view. This administration is dangerously out of control.

RedState

Geithner Admits Obama Has No Plan to Solve US Debt Crisis

Friday, February 17th, 2012

Get} audio listed here

Get} Podcast | iTunes | Podcast Feed

On right now’s edition of Espresso and Markets, Brad Jackson and Ben Domenech are joined by Francis Cianfrocca to go over the deteriorating circumstance in Greece, Tim Geithner’s testimony prior to Paul Ryan, and Obama’s missing plan for financial debt reduction.

We’re brought to you as always by BigGovernment and Stephen Clouse and Associates. If you’d like to e mail us, you can do so at espresso[at]newledger.com. We hope you get pleasure from the demonstrate.

Relevant Backlinks:

Greece noticed closer to bailout on ECB shift
To infinity and beyond! This is the personal debt chart Obama and Geithner ought to be ashamed of
Tim Geithner to Paul Ryan: “We don’t have a definitive remedy… We just don’t like yours”

Comply with Brad on Twitter
Adhere to Ben on Twitter
Comply with Francis on Twitter

Subscribe to The Transom

The hosts and visitors of Espresso and Markets talk only for ourselves, not any clientele or employers.

RedState

Media Matters staff: Neal Boortz Likens President Obama To Syria’s Assad

Friday, February 10th, 2012

Appropriate-wing talk radio host and regular Fox Reports guest Neal
Boortz, who has stated that President Obama
“is a greater disaster to this nation than nine-11,” is now comparing Obama to Syrian
President Bashar al-Assad. In a publish on his
Twitter feed, Boortz wrote: “Making an attempt to convince myself that beneath
the right situation Obama would not be another Bashir [sic] Assad. Attempting
…. but I are unable to”:

The Syrian
govt is at the moment engaged in cracking down on an 11-thirty day period-previous
uprising protesting the Assad family’s 42-12 months rule of the nation. The brutal
suppression has resulted in several
deaths. In accordance to human legal rights organizations, the existing military
assault on the metropolis of Homs has “killed
at the very least 300 civilians and wounded 1,000.” Numerous nations, including the
United States, have pulled
their diplomatic envoys from the nation amid the mounting violence.

In October
2011, Boortz stated that “Barack Obama is a greater catastrophe to this place
than nine-eleven.” Requested to describe his assertion, he additional that “killing 3,000 individuals
is a misfortune,” but that “killing the individualism, the self-reliance, and the
self-regard of the American people, like Barack Obama has done, is significantly far more
of a misfortune.” Boortz’s responses drew fireplace from nine-eleven victims’ families, who explained the comparison was an insult.

In December
2009, Boortz likewise wrote on his Twitter feed that 9-11 was
“[h]orrible,” but “the hurt Obama and the Dems are doing will
surpass this tragic occasion.”


Press Issues for America – County Reasonable

Media Matters staff: CNN’s Erickson: Obama “Claiming” To Be A Christian, “Chose To Pervert God’s Word”

Monday, February 6th, 2012

In a February 5 RedState post,
CNN contributor Erick Erickson attacked President
Obama’s invocation of scripture at the recent
National Prayer Breakfast as a “perversion” of the word of God. Erickson referred to Obama as
a “[s]inner” and
claimed he “has gone to war with Christian’s’
conscience.” From RedState.com:

But we must also point out that
Christians have an obligation to pray for their leaders and, given how the
President of the United State just twisted the words of our Lord and Savior, we
should pray all the more fervently for him because in reading Luke 12:48, he
clearly ignored or has no understand of Luke 12:47, the prior sentence, which
reads

“And that servant who knew his
master’s will but did not get ready or act according to his will, will receive
a severe beating.” (ESV)

One must wonder about the Christian
grounding of the people in the White House who encouraged the President of the
United States to pervert the words of the Living God.

[...]

The President this week chose to
pervert God’s Word to make the case for a tax increase, but he also chose to
ignore God’s word on life and is ordering Christians, while he claims to be
one, to violate their Christian conscience on abortion — requiring Christian
organizations to provide health insurance that will cover the cost of drugs
that induce abortions.

He is trying to have it both ways.
He is trying to use God’s Word to defend a tax policy that dissuades
individuals from giving gladly and charitably to the poor as God instructs and
is ignoring God’s Word in order to force fellow Christians into violating their
Christian conscience — something about which God cares a great deal.

This cannot end well for him,
particularly doing this claiming to be a Christian. And it might not end well
for the rest of us either. Barack Obama has gone to war with Christians’
consciences and he is perverting God’s word in the process to get his way on
public policy.

“First of all, then, I urge that
supplications, prayers, intercessions, and thanksgivings be made for all
people, for kings and all who are in high positions, that we may lead a
peaceful and quiet life, godly and dignified in every way.” 1 Timothy 2:1-2
(ESV)

Pray hard. The President needs it.

Previously:

Fox Uses Contraception Regulation To Push Obama Anti-Catholic Smear

Doocy: With Birth Control Rules, “Is [Obama] Provoking An Unnecessary War With America’s Religious Leaders?”

Fox Breathlessly Attempts To Smear Obama As Anti-Catholic

Malkin: Obama Is “Forcing An Abortion Mandate Down The Throats Of Religious People” With Contraception Regulation

Fox’s Crowder: Obama “Should Go Back To Burning The Taxpayer-Funded Incense To Whatever Pagan, Foreign Deity He’s Worshipping”


Media Matters for America – County Fair

The Perversion of the Words of Our Lord Jesus Christ by the Sinner Barack H. Obama

Sunday, February 5th, 2012

Rembrandt van rijn christ driving the money changers from the temple 16261I’m afraid we need a little Sunday morning theology. Hopefully someone at the White House will read this and realize just how ill advised the President was to do what he did this week and we should be praying hard for him to see the error of his ways on this.

In the Bible we read these things:

“And God blessed them. And God said to them, ‘Be fruitful and multiply and fill the earth and subdue it and have dominion over the fish of the sea and over the birds of the heavens and over every living thing that moves on the earth.’” Gen 1:28 (ESV)

“Did not he who made me in the womb make him? And did not one fashion us in the womb?” Job 31:15 (ESV)

“Your hands have made and fashioned me; give me understanding that I may learn your commandments.” Psalm 119:73 (ESV)

“For you formed my inward parts; you knitted me together in my mother’s womb.” Psalm 139:13 (ESV)

These are clear references to God intending people to procreate and recognize that, even in the womb, God played a vital role in the formation of children and we should not casually destroy life God himself created. These passages of scripture are what inspire so many pro-life advocates to defend the unborn.

Had the President of the United States stood at the National Prayer Breakfast and uttered any of those passages and then announced his intent to protect the unborn, abortion rights advocates would have stormed the White House and the Courts all in the name of separation of church and state. The media would have had on Barry Lynn to proclaim his outrage that the President was mixing religion and politics.

Jim Wallis would have gone on the news to dance around life issues and try his best to neuter God out of them and the media would have treated him as an objective source.

But that’s not what happened.

Instead, the President went to the National Prayer Breakfast and quoted Jesus Christ himself to defend a tax increase. The President paraphrased Luke 12:48, “Everyone to whom much was given, of him much will be required, and from him to whom they entrusted much, they will demand the more.” (ESV) He said it was because he was a Christian that he thought the rich should pay more in taxes.

It’s a good thing President Obama did not draw from Matthew 13:12 instead or the poor would really be screwed.

“For to the one who has, more will be given, and he will have an abundance, but from the one who has not, even what he has will be taken away.” (ESV)

It is worth pointing out that the very same people who would have been outraged had the President quoted clear scripture on life to defend the unborn were willing to be silent or even applaud the President perverting the words of Christ to pursue his tax plan.

It is also worth pointing out that President Obama sat at the feet of Jeremiah Wright for 20 years, so this might be the best he can do.

But we must also point out that Christians have an obligation to pray for their leaders and, given how the President of the United State just twisted the words of our Lord and Savior, we should pray all the more fervently for him because in reading Luke 12:48, he clearly ignored or has no understand of Luke 12:47, the prior sentence, which reads

“And that servant who knew his master’s will but did not get ready or act according to his will, will receive a severe beating.” (ESV)

One must wonder about the Christian grounding of the people in the White House who encouraged the President of the United States to pervert the words of the Living God.

What the President seems not to know is encapsulated well by Breeanne Howe here.

Christ was not talking about money. The President, in making the case for his tax plan using that passage of scripture, perverts Christ’s meaning. Christ was talking explicitly about the blessings flowing from God to the apostles and us through the Word and the need to proclaim Christ as the Living God.

To better understand what Christ was actually talking about, first understand that he was talking about an individual’s relationship with God. In fact, throughout President Obama’s speech he perverted a number of passages from Holy Scripture having to do with an individual’s obligations toward the poor and toward God, co-opting those passages as claims that the state can then tax and spend in the name of Jesus.

I dare say I’d take peddlers of the “social gospel” much more seriously if they concerned themselves first with the actual Gospel as it pertains to men’s salvation and eternity.

Not to delve deep into the theology, but Luke 12:47-48 is reflected in Hebrews 2:1-4, in which the writer preaches,

“Therefore we must pay much closer attention to what we have heard, lest we drift away from it. For since the message declared by angels proved to be reliable, and every transgression or disobedience received a just retribution, how shall we escape if we neglect such a great salvation? It was declared at first by the Lord, and it was attested to us by those who heard, while God also bore witness by signs and wonders and various miracles and by gifts of the Holy Spirit distributed according to his will.”

The Greek used for “pay much closer attention” (prosecho) and “lest we drift away” (pararheo) derive from Greek nautical terminology the original audience would have understood. Prosecho means to tie up or moor a ship in harbor (a metaphor for Christ) and pararheo means to negligently and knowingly let a ship drift past the harbor, or Christ.

In other words, what Christ is telling us in Luke and what the author of Hebrews explains in greater detail is that these passages apply to people who, like the President, claim to be Christians and claim to have experienced blessings in life and then turn their back on or drift away from Christ without securing themselves to him.

What both Hebrews 2 and Luke 12:47 say that the President conveniently ignored is that anyone who claims to be a Christian or who has experienced the blessings that flow from being surrounded by believers and then does not accept Christ will be judged more harshly on the last day than those who never knew or experienced Christ’s love. Yeah, those levels of hell aren’t just for Catholics. See e.g. Matthew 11:21-22 in which Christ says,

“Woe to you, Chorazin! Woe to you, Bethsaida! For if the mighty works done in you had been done in Tyre and Sidon, they would have repented long ago in sackcloth and ashes. But I tell you, it will be more bearable on the day of judgment for Tyre and Sidon than for you.” [Emphasis added]

Unfortunately for the nation, we have a President who claims to be a Christian who is willing to take God’s Holy Word repeatedly out of context, subsume God’s commands for individuals in their conduct with each other and with Him, and try to make the case for the government’s fiscal policy with that perversion.

Contrast that with his other actions this week.

The President, through the Department of Health and Human Services, has ordered religious organizations — targeting more specifically the Catholic Church — to offer health plans that cover the costs of contraceptives and abortifacient drugs. I started this post with, unlike the President’s use of Luke and Proverbs, un-perverted scripture Christians use to show their objections to abortion. But moreso, these are non exhaustive passages of scripture Catholics rely on as foundations both to their opposition to abortion and to contraception. God himself said, “Be fruitful and multiply.”

The President this week chose to pervert God’s Word to make the case for a tax increase, but he also chose to ignore God’s word on life and is ordering Christians, while he claims to be one, to violate their Christian conscience on abortion — requiring Christian organizations to provide health insurance that will cover the cost of drugs that induce abortions.

He is trying to have it both ways. He is trying to use God’s Word to defend a tax policy that dissuades individuals from giving gladly and charitably to the poor as God instructs and is ignoring God’s Word in order to force fellow Christians into violating their Christian conscience — something about which God cares a great deal.

This cannot end well for him, particularly doing this claiming to be a Christian. And it might not end well for the rest of us either. Barack Obama has gone to war with Christians’ consciences and he is perverting God’s word in the process to get his way on public policy.

“First of all, then, I urge that supplications, prayers, intercessions, and thanksgivings be made for all people, for kings and all who are in high positions, that we may lead a peaceful and quiet life, godly and dignified in every way.” 1 Timothy 2:1-2 (ESV)

Pray hard. The President needs it.

RedState